ZIP code
12604
in Poughkeepsie, New YorkPopulation 2,316
60.68/ 100
Ranked #4,342 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.6%)
Ranked #560 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 32%)
Ranked #51 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (bottom 34%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
13.0%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
8.4%
in the bottom 0.08% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
1.3%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
0.70%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Obesity
16.3%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.50%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
1.6%
in the bottom 0.06% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›The read
ZIP 12604, one of several in Poughkeepsie, New York, in overall standing, comes out in the top 13.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,342nd) and the top 32% of New York (560th).
A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled obesity sits in the bottom 0.2% nationally, self-care disability stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Fatal road crashes sits at the national minimum. On the other hand, home broadband subscription stands at the national minimum, and poverty resides at the national maximum. Housing-cost burden sits at the national maximum, and modeled loneliness stands in the top 0.4% nationally. Homeownership resides at the national minimum, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 0.8% nationally.
Set within its surrounding area, home broadband subscription runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 12603, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.4%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 86%
11%
Disability
healthier than 98%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 74%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 45%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 58%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 8%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 8%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.8%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 66%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 1%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.2%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 22%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 99%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 92%
11%
Disability
healthier than 99%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 48%
14%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 1%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 1%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 21%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 45.3; chronic-disease standing 99.6 (top 1%) — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #14,834 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
12603
New Yorkshares a border
Score 62.74
Closest healthier
12528
New Yorkabout 2.4 mi away
Score 62.21
Similar health profile
08240
New Jersey99% similar profile
Score 60.43
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 4.3% | 3.6–5.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 8.4% | 7.1–10.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 1.0% | 0.9–1.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 9.8–12.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 0.7% | 0.6–0.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 1.4% | 1.1–1.8 |
| Depression among adults | 24.4% | 20.7–28.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 1.3% | 1.1–1.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 13.0% | 11.1–15.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 16.3% | 12.9–20.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.5% | 0.4–0.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.9% | 9.5–14.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.4% | 3.9–7.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 25.8% | 23.3–28.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 70.0% | 65.6–74.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 74.2% | 69.5–78.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.3% | 61.6–70.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 65.5% | 61.9–68.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.8% | 66.6–80.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.3% | 17.3–24.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 5.0% | 3.4–6.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 13.9% | 10.3–17.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.9% | 30.0–40.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 8.7% | 6.6–10.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 23.0% | 18.6–26.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 6.7% | 5.2–8.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.4% | 13.3–20.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 21.8% | 17.1–26.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 1.6% | 1.4–1.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.3% | 5.4–8.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 2.4% | 1.9–2.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.0% | 0.8–1.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.8% | 2.2–3.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.3% | 23.2–33.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.2% | 9.3–17.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 4.6–10.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.3% | 7.4–13.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.0% | 7.5–12.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 47.4% | 41.1–53.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.9% | 3.6–6.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 100.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 0.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 100.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 6.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 20.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.5 yr ± 1.72 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured