Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12549

in Montgomery, New YorkPopulation 10,745

61.34/ 100

Ranked #3,915 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.3%)

Ranked #504 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #46 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

0.6 mi

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.9%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$122,734

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Montgomery, New York (ZIP 12549) lands in the top 12.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,915th) and the top 29% of New York (504th).

continue reading

A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: home broadband subscription rests in the top 7.7% nationally, and household income is in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 12.1% nationally, and mammography lies in the top 10.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Pharmacy lands in the top 14.8% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 14.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 10915, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.8%23.0–28.7
High blood pressure among adults31.6%28.3–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Depression among adults18.6%15.9–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.0–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%31.6–39.1
Obesity among adults30.7%25.6–36.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.0–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.3–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%73.9–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.1–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults89.9%88.5–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%65.7–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.6%63.3–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%73.5–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.1–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.6–26.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%31.7–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%14.0–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Any disability among adults25.2%22.1–28.6
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.3–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.5–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.3–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.7–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.0–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.0–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription97.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate84.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population7.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households48.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$122,734$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$407,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,633$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured