Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12477

in Saugerties, New YorkPopulation 19,066

57.46/ 100

Ranked #6,835 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #818 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #32 of 52 Kingston, NY ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

60%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Saugerties, New York (ZIP 12477) stands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,835th) and the top 47% of New York (818th).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 14.3% nationally, subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 14.5% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 14.6% nationally. Modeled obesity registers in the bottom 17% nationally, colon screening lies in the top 14.2% nationally, and cognitive disability is in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas registers in the top 7.9% nationally, and fine-particle lies in the top 17% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 12453, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kingston, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.3–32.6
High blood pressure among adults37.6%33.9–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Depression among adults19.9%17.1–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.4–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%34.7–42.6
Obesity among adults29.9%24.8–35.6
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.3–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.9–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%76.0–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.2–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%89.2–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%66.8–75.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.2%61.8–68.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%70.3–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.7–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.3–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%20.2–27.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.5%31.1–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.3–18.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.6–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.1–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Any disability among adults26.6%23.4–30.1
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.4
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%18.9–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.7–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.9–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.0–12.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%6.0–7.8
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.2–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate69.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age45.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$80,861$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$331,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,209$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured