Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12443

in Hurley, New YorkPopulation 3,559

60.66/ 100

Ranked #4,352 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.6%)

Ranked #563 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #19 of 52 Kingston, NY ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

28%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.6%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.8%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Hurley, New York (ZIP 12443) ranks in the top 13.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,352nd) and the top 33% of New York (563rd).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled loneliness is in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 7.8% nationally, tree cover lies in the top 11.1% nationally, and mammography resides in the top 11.1% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 12.3% nationally, and uninsured sits in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Against that, fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas is in the top 15% nationally.

In plainer terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 12491, just across the boundary. The area additionally sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kingston, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.1–32.6
High blood pressure among adults37.8%34.1–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.6–8.0
Depression among adults19.3%16.5–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.4–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%35.0–42.9
Obesity among adults30.0%24.8–35.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.4%6.8–10.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.8%3.9–5.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.3–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.7%79.9–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.4%90.0–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%67.2–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.5–70.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%73.7–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.4–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.9%8.9–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.9%18.2–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%30.5–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%12.9–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.4–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.3–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.2–12.3
Any disability among adults24.8%21.4–28.6
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Mobility disability among adults12.6%10.7–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.9–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.4–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.3–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.4–11.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Loneliness among adults28.0%23.8–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population6.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households72.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+25.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age50.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$104,412$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$375,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,241$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.82 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured