Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12131

in North Blenheim, New YorkPopulation 183

54.86/ 100

Ranked #9,609 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #1,047 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #79 of 114 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

24.6 mi

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

31.7 mi

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.2%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

74%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.5%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.1%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

North Blenheim, New York (ZIP 12131), by its composite score, sits in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,609th) and the bottom 39% of New York (1,047th).

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Modeled pfas settles in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and tree cover sits in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and expected annual loss rests in the bottom 8.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. By contrast, distance to a community health center lands in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol stands in the top 8.6% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 12071, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.0–37.6
High blood pressure among adults42.1%37.7–46.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.6%11.3–13.8
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.2–10.6
Depression among adults18.4%15.6–21.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.1–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.5%39.1–48.0
Obesity among adults32.9%26.5–39.9
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%10.2–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.3–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%79.5–85.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.0%81.2–86.6
Cholesterol screening among adults92.3%90.9–93.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%67.9–76.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.7%59.8–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.8%74.3–86.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.5–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%10.5–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%21.5–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%32.2–44.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%14.9–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.0–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.6–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.3–13.1
Any disability among adults29.6%24.9–34.4
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.3–9.7
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.6–9.4
Mobility disability among adults16.2%13.4–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.4–4.9
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.1–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.2–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.4–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.5–12.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.2–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.9–7.1
Loneliness among adults29.3%24.5–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.6–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)7.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle7.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription83.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate91.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+26.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$71,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$165,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$950$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 1.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.67 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured