Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10033

in New York, New YorkPopulation 54,838

54.85/ 100

Ranked #9,631 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #1,048 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #729 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 14.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

440 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

11.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

75.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

33.9%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.6%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

15.8%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.3%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.3%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.8%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 10033, one of several in New York, New York ranks in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,631st) and the bottom 39% of New York (1,048th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: walkability is in the top 0.2% nationally, and modeled obesity settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Set against that, modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 0.3% nationally, and households without a vehicle registers in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise rests in the top 1.0% nationally, homeownership stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lies in the top 2.7% nationally. Lead in tap water lands in the top 3.2% nationally, crowded housing sits in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled loneliness is in the top 4.5% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Close by, ZIP 10034, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 1.0%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $75,040 predicts 78.9 years — 3.3 years above.

    Ranked #353 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 7.3 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 91.7 (top 10%) — 84 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,517 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.4 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.8%18.3–21.6
High blood pressure among adults27.2%25.4–29.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.5–6.5
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.7–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Depression among adults18.4%16.7–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%10.1–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%35.2–39.8
Obesity among adults22.6%20.3–25.5
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.9%9.1–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.8%12.7–16.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%70.7–75.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%75.5–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.4–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%59.0–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.5%54.9–60.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%70.9–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.3%19.4–23.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.8%8.7–11.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%25.2–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%33.8–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%20.1–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.6–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.8–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.5–15.4
Any disability among adults29.5%27.2–32.1
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.8–6.0
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Mobility disability among adults14.8%13.4–16.4
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.8%26.0–31.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.8–27.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.9–22.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.9–22.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
Loneliness among adults39.8%36.5–43.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6412.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)20.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)12.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle75.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription90.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate15.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population39.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households33.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+15.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$75,040$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$695,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,726$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured