Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11752

in Islip Terrace, New YorkPopulation 9,204

64.31/ 100

Ranked #2,293 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.2%)

Ranked #312 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #453 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$151,917

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Park land

37.1%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.5 mi

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.0%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Islip Terrace, New York (ZIP 11752) lands in the top 7.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,293rd) and the top 18% of New York (312th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: household income registers in the top 3.7% nationally, and park land rests in the top 3.6% nationally. Fiber broadband stands in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and mammography sits in the top 8.7% nationally. On the other side, PFOA in drinking water is at the national maximum, PFOS in drinking water settles at the national maximum, and PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum. Distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 8.8% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 11739, about 0.3 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.0%21.8–26.2
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.9–33.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Depression among adults17.0%14.9–19.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.9–10.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%36.1–41.8
Obesity among adults29.4%25.8–33.1
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%7.0–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.1–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.6–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.5–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.2–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%64.9–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.1%63.6–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%76.0–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.4–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.9%8.2–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%19.8–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%35.8–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.6%12.7–16.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.8–12.7
Any disability among adults25.4%22.5–28.4
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Mobility disability among adults11.4%9.8–13.1
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.2–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.1–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Loneliness among adults29.5%25.9–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)10.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate88.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population15.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households45.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$151,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$527,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,466$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured