Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11414

in Howard Beach, New YorkPopulation 31,308

60.82/ 100

Ranked #4,250 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.3%)

Ranked #549 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #601 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

25.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.9%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

20.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Park land

25%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

40.8%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.9 pCi/L

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Howard Beach, New York (ZIP 11414), overall, ranks in the top 13.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,250th) and the top 32% of New York (549th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled obesity registers in the bottom 4.1% nationally, walkability resides in the top 4.6% nationally, and park land settles in the top 5.6% nationally. Transit is in the top 10.0% nationally. On the other side, outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lands in the top 2.5% nationally. Lead in tap water lies in the top 2.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the top 9.2% nationally. Unemployment rests in the top 10.6% nationally, and households without a vehicle registers in the top 11.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 11375, about 2.2 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.6–26.2
High blood pressure among adults32.7%30.0–35.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Depression among adults16.6%14.5–18.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%38.8–44.8
Obesity among adults23.9%20.7–27.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%9.2–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.8–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.1–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.8–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.7%89.5–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.6%67.1–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.7%61.6–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%75.7–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.9–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%9.1–12.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%23.6–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%31.7–36.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%16.1–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.5–15.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Any disability among adults29.0%26.2–32.0
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.2–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.8%24.2–29.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.6–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.2–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.9–15.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Loneliness among adults35.9%32.8–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle11.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription91.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate73.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population19.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households41.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+24.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age44.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$95,051$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$660,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,113$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured