Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10026

in New York, New YorkPopulation 37,123

60.76/ 100

Ranked #4,290 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.4%)

Ranked #552 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #604 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

3,240 units

in the top 0.08% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

74%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

23.5%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.7%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

200 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

41.1%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 10026, one of several in New York, New York places in the top 13.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,290th) and the top 32% of New York (552nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 0.08% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Walkability registers in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled obesity settles in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum. Pulling the other way, households without a vehicle lies in the top 0.5% nationally, homeownership rests in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and modeled loneliness resides in the top 2.7% nationally. Lead in tap water is in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 10025, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 37.3; chronic-disease standing 90.4 (top 10%) — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,700 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 79.4 ± 1.9 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.7%18.3–21.6
High blood pressure among adults29.7%27.9–32.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Current asthma among adults11.1%10.2–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.2–5.2
Depression among adults18.6%16.9–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.2–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%32.2–36.8
Obesity among adults24.0%21.6–27.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.9–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.8–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%71.4–76.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%78.2–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%87.3–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%61.7–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.7%56.0–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%74.9–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%18.6–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%9.3–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%21.3–26.0
Short sleep duration among adults41.3%38.1–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%16.8–20.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.4–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%11.1–13.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.5–14.0
Any disability among adults25.9%23.9–28.5
Hearing disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.4–9.0
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.8–14.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%27.9–33.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.1%19.8–24.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.6–22.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.4%17.3–21.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Loneliness among adults41.1%37.8–44.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)10.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle74.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription91.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate23.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population28.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households29.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+10.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age37.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$81,244$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$1,052,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,657$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured