ZIP code
07977
in Peapack, New JerseyPopulation 917
71.34/ 100
Ranked #370 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.2%)
Ranked #81 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 13.9%)
Ranked #141 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 17%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Median household income
$150,875
in the top 3.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST76thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
19.6%
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
3.8%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST18thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
6.8%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
24.8%
in the bottom 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
3.3%
in the top 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.0%
in the bottom 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.7%
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Peapack, New Jersey (ZIP 07977) lands in the top 1.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (370th) and the top 13.9% of New Jersey (81st).
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: household income stands in the top 3.8% nationally, poverty rests at the national minimum, and home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally, mobility disability settles in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and coronary heart disease lands in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled transportation noise lies in the top 2.6% nationally, and loud transportation noise stands in the top 3.1% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. On the overall standing, ZIP 07924, about 0.3 miles away, ranks healthier. In the round, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the top 0.5%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 75%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 92%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 96%
8%
Disability
in the top 0.8%
7%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 49%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 10%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 26%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 97%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 98%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 84%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 61%
8%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 53%
13%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 15%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 37%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 5%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 94%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 98%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 85%
11%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 41%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 54%
8%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 11%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 29%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
07921
New Jerseyshares a border
Score 70.05
Closest healthier
07924
New Jerseyabout 0.3 mi away
Score 71.96
Similar health profile
30328
Georgia99% similar profile
Score 71.00
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 18.5% | 16.3–21.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 24.8% | 22.0–27.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.3% | 6.6–8.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.4% | 7.4–9.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.7% | 3.2–4.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.2% | 2.5–4.0 |
| Depression among adults | 16.0% | 13.6–18.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 7.3% | 6.1–8.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 35.2% | 32.0–38.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 25.1% | 20.9–30.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.9% | 1.7–2.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 3.8% | 3.0–4.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.2% | 5.5–9.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.2% | 71.0–77.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.3% | 74.1–80.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.4% | 87.1–91.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 68.9% | 64.5–73.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 74.4% | 71.5–77.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.3% | 70.9–83.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.7% | 14.0–19.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 6.2% | 4.6–8.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 15.9% | 12.8–19.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.7% | 30.1–39.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 10.1% | 8.2–12.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.5% | 11.5–15.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 9.0% | 7.6–10.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 9.1% | 7.4–11.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 17.5% | 14.4–21.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.0% | 3.5–4.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.6–5.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 6.8% | 5.5–8.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.9% | 1.6–2.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.7% | 2.3–3.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.6% | 16.5–23.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 5.4–9.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 3.3% | 2.3–4.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.9% | 5.5–8.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.5% | 3.6–5.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.7% | 27.6–35.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 3.8% | 3.1–4.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NJ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 5.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 15.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 70.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 44.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 94.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 30.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 31.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585 |
| Homeownership rate | 73.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585 |
| Foreign-born population | 22.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 13.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590 |
| Single-parent households | 28.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 49.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581 |
| Population 65+ | 14.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590 |
| Median age | 35.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582 |
| Median household income | $150,875 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565 |
| Median home value | $870,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NJ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.6 yr ± 1.18 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured