Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

07461

in Sussex, New JerseyPopulation 18,731

58.87/ 100

Ranked #5,693 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #399 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #653 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US90th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.3 pCi/L

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Sussex, New Jersey (ZIP 07461) lands in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,693rd) and the bottom 32% of New Jersey (399th).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: modeled obesity rests in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled mobility disability resides in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and diabetes settles in the bottom 14.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability is in the bottom 18% nationally, and grocery sits in the top 18% nationally. Working the other way, modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 9.6% nationally, and disaster risk lies in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 11.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 17% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. On the overall standing, ZIP 07418, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.9%22.1–27.9
High blood pressure among adults34.0%30.4–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Depression among adults19.3%16.5–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.5–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.8–43.8
Obesity among adults27.8%22.4–33.8
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.0–10.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.2–9.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.3–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.3–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.2–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%59.8–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.2%65.9–72.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%66.9–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.2–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.0–15.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.7%19.1–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%30.6–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%14.2–18.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.3–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Any disability among adults24.8%21.3–28.2
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.5–12.6
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.6–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.2–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.5–7.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.5–7.1
Loneliness among adults32.6%28.2–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription93.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate79.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population6.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+18.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age41.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$106,981$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$370,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,447$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured