Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06247

in Hampton, ConnecticutPopulation 2,412

58.67/ 100

Ranked #5,848 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #190 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #38 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

29 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Hampton, Connecticut (ZIP 06247) ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,848th) and the bottom 31% of Connecticut (190th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled expected annual loss settles at the national minimum, and colon screening resides in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover rests in the top 10.7% nationally, park land stands in the top 15% nationally, and homeownership lies in the top 16% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lands in the bottom 16% nationally. Set against that, fatal road crashes sits in the top 14.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic is in the top 15% nationally. Recreation settles at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 06242, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.2%25.2–31.2
High blood pressure among adults36.0%32.6–39.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.3
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.8–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.4–7.6
Depression among adults22.9%19.9–26.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%8.9–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.7–42.9
Obesity among adults32.3%27.3–37.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.7–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.2–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.6–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.2–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.0–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.4%71.8–78.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.7%68.8–74.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%72.4–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.7–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.9%9.7–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.8%20.9–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%32.4–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.0–17.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.0–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.3–13.8
Any disability among adults26.9%23.2–30.8
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.7–7.8
Mobility disability among adults11.9%9.9–13.9
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.0–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.9–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.4%5.7–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.9–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.0–7.0
Loneliness among adults30.3%26.5–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate90.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households58.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+22.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age46.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$108,854$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$293,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,226$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 1.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.40 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured