Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05473

in North Ferrisburgh, VermontPopulation 1,423

63.01/ 100

Ranked #2,964 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #30 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 12.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.68 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.7%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.1%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.1%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.6%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.5%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.1%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.8%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.3%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, North Ferrisburgh, Vermont (ZIP 05473) comes out in the top 9.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,964th) and the top 12.1% of Vermont (30th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: childcare registers in the top 5.5% nationally, modeled diabetes stands in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Poverty lies in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and modeled obesity sits in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 7.0% nationally.

In plain terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 05445, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.1–29.8
High blood pressure among adults30.7%27.6–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.5–6.4
Depression among adults24.6%21.5–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.8–36.3
Obesity among adults27.5%22.9–32.2
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.6%9.4–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.2–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.1–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%75.0–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.5–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%69.4–76.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.2%69.2–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%72.7–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.6–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%7.6–11.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.4%13.4–19.6
Short sleep duration among adults29.1%25.1–33.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.6%10.6–14.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.7–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.7–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.4–12.8
Any disability among adults22.0%18.7–25.4
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.8
Independent living disability among adults5.8%4.9–6.8
Mobility disability among adults9.1%7.6–10.8
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–642.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate93.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population4.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households55.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+24.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$99,919$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$435,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,375$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth87.8 yr ± 2.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.23 years of 87.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured