Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04945

in Jackman, MainePopulation 1,325

46.22/ 100

Ranked #21,076 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #247 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.89 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

38.1 mi

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

42.1 mi

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

43 mi

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

3.8 days/year

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.89 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.97 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.89 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.6%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Jackman, Maine (ZIP 04945), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 34% nationally (21,076th) and the bottom 39% of Maine (247th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: distance to a nursing home lies in the top 1.0% nationally, distance to an emergency room sits in the top 1.0% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden registers in the top 3.0% nationally. On the brighter side, grocery stands in the top 0.5% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and outpatient resides in the top 2.5% nationally. Childcare rests in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled pfas lies in the bottom 4.3% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 04442, about 11 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.5%32.6–38.4
High blood pressure among adults39.1%35.8–42.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.2
Current asthma among adults13.3%11.9–14.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
Depression among adults27.9%24.9–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.8–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%37.8–44.4
Obesity among adults36.3%31.5–41.0
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.8–16.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.6–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.7–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.5–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.2–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.4–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.4%60.4–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%72.3–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.8–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.3%15.3–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%22.7–30.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%31.6–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%19.2–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.0–19.4
Any disability among adults36.6%32.7–40.5
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.7–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.4–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.4–15.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.3%14.8–21.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.4–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.6–10.4
Loneliness among adults33.7%30.1–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–648.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate89.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households66.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+23.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age52.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$52,045$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$197,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$800$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured