Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04922

in Burnham, MainePopulation 953

40.53/ 100

Ranked #26,387 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #356 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 12.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outpatient-care access

0.91 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.9%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

10.9%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

10.0%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

13.2%

in the top 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US71st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Burnham, Maine (ZIP 04922) comes out in the bottom 18% nationally (26,387th) and the bottom 12.8% of Maine (356th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: outpatient lands in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, modeled energy burden rests in the top 3.4% nationally, and distance to a nursing home lies in the top 12.2% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits in the top 13.4% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 16% nationally. Walkability registers in the bottom 17% nationally. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 18% nationally.

In plain terms, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 04927, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.2%33.1–39.2
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.8–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults14.3%12.7–15.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%9.4–13.5
Depression among adults30.2%26.8–33.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%36.8–43.6
Obesity among adults37.7%32.6–42.5
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.4–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%7.4–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.0–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.4–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.0–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%66.4–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%54.6–61.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%72.2–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%12.0–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.2%16.3–24.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%23.0–32.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%31.3–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.7%20.7–28.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.4%18.0–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%15.6–20.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%15.9–21.7
Any disability among adults38.4%33.5–43.2
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.2–12.8
Mobility disability among adults18.3%15.5–21.5
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.2–5.9
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%21.1–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%11.8–18.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.2%17.6–27.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.6–15.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.4–11.9
Loneliness among adults32.9%28.8–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–11.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–6413.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)12.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate87.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+22.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age48.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$59,261$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$178,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,308$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured