Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04270

in Oxford, MainePopulation 6,284

43.40/ 100

Ranked #24,010 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #317 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

0.66 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.2%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

0.8 mi

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

29.3 days/year

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

13.1%

in the top 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US71st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Oxford, Maine (ZIP 04270) sits in the bottom 25% nationally (24,010th) and the bottom 22% of Maine (317th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: civic rests in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Grocery lands in the top 10.0% nationally, and childcare rests in the top 10.9% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 12.2% nationally, and distance to an emergency room lands in the bottom 18% nationally. On the other hand, slow internet speeds rests in the top 9.5% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 14.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden lands in the top 11.8% nationally, and households without a vehicle rests in the top 17% nationally.

Put plainly, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 04015, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.9–37.5
High blood pressure among adults37.1%34.1–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults13.8%12.4–15.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Depression among adults27.0%24.1–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.9–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%37.6–44.1
Obesity among adults35.5%31.1–40.6
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.6–23.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.8–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.8–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.0–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.1–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.9–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.9%53.7–60.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.9–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.4–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%16.6–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%22.5–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%29.8–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%20.4–26.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.8–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.3–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%16.0–20.2
Any disability among adults33.9%30.4–37.8
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.5
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.4–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%22.3–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.0–17.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.7%17.9–23.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.2–15.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Loneliness among adults33.2%29.5–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–6416.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)8.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription91.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate89.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households65.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$74,241$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$216,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,031$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured