Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04543

in Damariscotta, MainePopulation 2,192

53.15/ 100

Ranked #11,857 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #122 of 408 Maine ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outpatient-care access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

6.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.1%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.2%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Damariscotta, Maine (ZIP 04543) comes out in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,857th) and the top 30% of Maine (122nd).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: outpatient lies in the top 0.3% nationally, physicians sits in the top 0.7% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 1.0% nationally. Mental-health providers registers in the top 1.1% nationally, grocery stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and recreation lands in the top 2.4% nationally. Childcare is in the top 3.2% nationally, and dental providers resides in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outpatient runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 04539, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.8%36.5–43.1
High blood pressure among adults40.9%37.4–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.1%11.9–14.3
Current asthma among adults12.3%11.0–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%7.8–11.2
Depression among adults26.5%23.5–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%10.9–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%38.7–45.7
Obesity among adults30.8%26.2–35.7
Stroke among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.2–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.7–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.8–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.5%82.0–86.7
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%87.8–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.2%70.6–77.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.6%62.5–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.1–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%10.1–14.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%10.4–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.0%18.8–27.4
Short sleep duration among adults28.1%24.3–32.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.1%16.0–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.2–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%12.8–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.1–16.3
Any disability among adults34.3%30.0–38.8
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.0–11.8
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.0–9.9
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.0–19.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.1–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.2–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.2–10.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.4%9.9–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.6–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.6
Loneliness among adults29.7%26.1–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.1–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–6418.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)8.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate70.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households49.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+31.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age49.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$59,423$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$363,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,027$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured