Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04464

in Monson, MainePopulation 596

47.82/ 100

Ranked #19,161 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #217 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10.8 per million

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

8.4 days/year

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

77.5%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.2%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.2%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.5%

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.3%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Monson, Maine (ZIP 04464) places in the bottom 40% nationally (19,161st) and the bottom 47% of Maine (217th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: fiber broadband resides in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 5.5% nationally, and tree cover stands in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas settles in the bottom 10.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 8.3% nationally, energy burden lies in the top 7.3% nationally, and arsenic rests in the top 9.4% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 10.4% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 04441, about 3.5 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 1.0%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.7%36.2–43.1
High blood pressure among adults42.4%38.4–46.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.3–12.8
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.2–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%8.9–13.3
Depression among adults25.5%22.3–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.3–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.3%39.5–46.8
Obesity among adults35.2%30.0–40.4
Stroke among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.2–17.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.1–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.5–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.9%81.0–86.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.0–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.9–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.8–61.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%71.6–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%11.1–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%14.1–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%22.1–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%30.5–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%18.6–26.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.5–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%14.8–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.2–18.0
Any disability among adults34.9%30.1–39.4
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Independent living disability among adults9.2%7.7–10.8
Mobility disability among adults18.1%14.7–21.1
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.5–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.4–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%9.6–15.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.7%12.9–21.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.4–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.6
Loneliness among adults30.3%26.4–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.9–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–6427.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)17.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle0.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription84.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households70.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+31.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age47.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$56,017$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$178,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.8 yr ± 2.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.09 years of 72.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured