Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03830

in East Wakefield, New HampshirePopulation 1,381

53.89/ 100

Ranked #10,835 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #209 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 14.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

97.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.68%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

20.1%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

42 intersections/sq mi

in the top 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

East Wakefield, New Hampshire (ZIP 03830), by its overall standing, sits in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,835th) and the bottom 14.0% of New Hampshire (209th).

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: homeownership sits in the top 6.3% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription registers in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening lands in the top 7.3% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 16% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 16% nationally. By contrast, fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds sits in the top 16% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 03872, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.3–36.9
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.5–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.7%10.5–12.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.1–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.0–10.5
Depression among adults22.8%19.7–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%9.9–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%35.7–43.0
Obesity among adults33.0%27.6–38.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.1%14.0–20.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.2–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%78.8–84.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.9–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.2–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.0%68.6–76.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.8%63.4–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%68.4–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.8–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%10.5–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%18.8–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%28.8–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%14.2–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.2–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.3–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Any disability among adults27.9%23.9–32.3
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.4
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.4–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.0–17.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.2–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%18.0–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.2–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.1–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.8–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–7.1
Loneliness among adults29.2%25.1–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription97.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate97.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households81.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+27.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age53.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$99,960$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$353,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.0 yr ± 2.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.00 years of 83.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured