ZIP code
03751
in Georges Mills, New HampshirePopulation 397
56.01/ 100
Ranked #8,265 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)
Ranked #173 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 29%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
26.9%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 6.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS6thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Mammography
82.1%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
7.2%
in the bottom 6.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS7thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 8.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS8thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.2%
in the top 8.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
7.2%
in the bottom 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST36thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
2.8%
in the bottom 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST18thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Georges Mills, New Hampshire (ZIP 03751) stands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,265th) and the bottom 29% of New Hampshire (173rd).
A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: homeownership is at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum. Modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and disaster risk is in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the top 3.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the bottom 8.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled hearing disability is in the top 8.0% nationally.
For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 03257, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 84%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 70%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 89%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 89%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 88%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 67%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 25%
21%
Disability
healthier than 39%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 83%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 65%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 61%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 89%
8%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Disability
healthier than 4%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 30%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 11%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
03257
New Hampshireshares a border
Score 67.52
Closest healthier
03284
New Hampshireshares a border
Score 63.09
Similar health profile
61419
Illinois98% similar profile
Score 54.67
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 37.0% | 33.3–40.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.5% | 37.4–45.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.7% | 12.2–15.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.3% | 9.0–11.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.4% | 7.9–11.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.9% | 6.7–11.4 |
| Depression among adults | 21.1% | 17.9–24.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.9% | 10.8–15.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.5% | 37.4–45.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 31.5% | 25.9–36.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.8% | 3.9–5.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.8% | 10.5–15.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.0% | 5.1–9.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.6% | 78.5–84.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.3% | 77.1–83.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.6% | 89.0–92.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 68.8% | 64.6–73.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 61.9% | 58.4–65.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 82.1% | 76.8–86.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.5% | 10.3–14.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.0% | 8.3–13.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.5% | 20.2–31.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.1% | 27.5–37.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.0% | 14.1–22.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.9% | 11.1–14.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.1% | 11.6–16.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.8% | 9.6–14.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 32.8% | 27.7–38.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.2% | 9.5–13.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.4% | 6.5–10.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.6% | 13.7–21.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.3–5.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.5% | 4.3–7.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.2% | 16.7–24.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.7% | 7.1–12.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 5.2–10.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 5.6–9.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.7% | 4.6–7.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 26.9% | 22.9–31.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.2% | 4.2–6.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 2.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 7.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 58.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 38.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 7.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 86.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243 |
| Foreign-born population | 5.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243 |
| Single-parent households | 97.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 60.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243 |
| Population 65+ | 72.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243 |
| Median age | 77.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 47.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 86.4 yr ± 2.81 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.81 years of 86.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured