Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03448

in Gilsum, New HampshirePopulation 716

54.24/ 100

Ranked #10,387 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #204 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

84.8%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

14.5 mi

in the top 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

7.4%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.56%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Gilsum, New Hampshire (ZIP 03448) ranks in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,387th) and the bottom 16% of New Hampshire (204th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: childcare settles in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Homeownership rests in the top 10.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 12.9% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 14.2% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 16% nationally. Set against that, distance to a community health center settles in the top 12.9% nationally.

To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 03431, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%28.3–34.7
High blood pressure among adults35.3%32.0–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.1–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%6.6–9.8
Depression among adults24.2%21.1–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.2–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.3%30.9–37.9
Obesity among adults32.4%27.4–38.2
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.6–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%5.7–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.3–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.7%71.1–78.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.1–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.4–73.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.8–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%70.0–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.0–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%11.2–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.6%18.5–27.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%29.5–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%14.7–21.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.4–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.0–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%11.8–16.4
Any disability among adults30.5%26.2–35.2
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.4
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.5–9.2
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.2–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.2–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.1–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%6.8–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.5–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.6–8.2
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.6–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.4–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate93.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$80,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$241,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,575$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 1.2978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured