Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03260

in North Sutton, New HampshirePopulation 976

65.33/ 100

Ranked #1,876 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranked #21 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (top 8.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.4%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

97.7%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.0%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

72.1%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST59th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, North Sutton, New Hampshire (ZIP 03260) lands in the top 5.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,876th) and the top 8.7% of New Hampshire (21st).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum, modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Modeled transportation is in the bottom 4.4% nationally, recreation sits in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Modeled mammography lies in the top 3.3% nationally, and homeownership stands in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

On the overall standing, ZIP 03255, just across the boundary, ranks healthier. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 4.4% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%24.9–30.5
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.4–33.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.1–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.5–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.3–6.5
Depression among adults23.3%20.2–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.3%7.0–9.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%29.9–36.3
Obesity among adults32.5%27.6–37.4
Stroke among adults2.7%2.3–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.6–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%3.4–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%72.6–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.4–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%88.8–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.4%70.2–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.3%72.8–77.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.4%78.2–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.0–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%6.7–11.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.6%13.3–20.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.1%28.5–35.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.0%9.8–14.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.0–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.6%9.0–12.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.4%8.5–12.3
Any disability among adults23.5%19.8–27.3
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Independent living disability among adults5.6%4.6–6.7
Mobility disability among adults10.3%8.4–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.1–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.2–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.0–9.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%3.4–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.1–8.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.7–5.7
Loneliness among adults27.0%23.5–30.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.6–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate97.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population4.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households76.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age48.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$117,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$369,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.4 yr ± 1.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.90 years of 84.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured