Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02905

in Providence, Rhode IslandPopulation 25,012

50.64/ 100

Ranked #15,351 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #71 of 77 Rhode Island ZIPs (bottom 7.8%)

Ranked #97 of 112 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA ZIPs (bottom 13.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,077 units

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.1%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST24th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

23%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

16.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

42.7%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST70th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.9%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 02905, one of several in Providence, Rhode Island lands in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,351st) and the bottom 7.8% of Rhode Island (71st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 1.2% nationally, and physicians registers in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the top 3.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Transit lies in the top 7.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled loneliness lands in the top 4.0% nationally, modeled housing insecurity sits in the top 5.6% nationally, and households without a vehicle is in the top 6.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles in the top 7.3% nationally, and modeled food insecurity resides in the top 7.9% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 02888, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Providence-Warwick, RI-MA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.2 ± 1.3 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.0 years — 1.9 years below them.

    Ranked #1,541 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.2%19.3–23.3
High blood pressure among adults31.6%28.9–34.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%5.0–5.9
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.4–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Depression among adults22.8%20.1–25.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.4–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.7%28.9–34.5
Obesity among adults35.4%30.6–40.3
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.4%12.3–16.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.2%13.2–17.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.5%72.1–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.4–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.1–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%62.3–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.2%56.9–63.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.5%78.0–86.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.7–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%11.0–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%29.5–36.9
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%35.7–44.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%20.9–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.4–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.5–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.9–19.7
Any disability among adults32.5%29.3–35.8
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.4
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Mobility disability among adults14.3%12.9–15.8
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.7–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%23.7–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.9%25.5–30.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.1%21.6–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.0%20.9–25.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.5%12.1–14.9
Loneliness among adults40.1%36.5–43.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.2–15.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (0.0–17.9%) n=77
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2863.7% (0.0–9.3%) n=77
No HS diploma (25+)24.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (1.2–17.4%) n=77
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.8% (20.4–68.2%) n=77
Unemployment rate (16+)10.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–8.3%) n=77
Households without a vehicle16.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.1%) n=77
Broadband subscription83.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (87.7–100.0%) n=77
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.7% (18.9–42.2%) n=77
Homeownership rate49.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (38.8–95.1%) n=77
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.1%) n=77
Foreign-born population30.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.9% (1.6–20.3%) n=77
Single-parent households45.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.0% (35.9–70.5%) n=75
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.1% (10.7–35.3%) n=77
Median age35.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.0 yr (34.6–53.3) n=76
Median household income$62,908$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$102,118 ($62,908–$137,181) n=71
Median home value$371,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$411,900 ($336,020–$633,580) n=73
Median gross rent$1,175$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,374 ($1,168–$1,781) n=59
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)RI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.8–83.6) n=72

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured