Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02472

in Watertown Town, MassachusettsPopulation 35,620

67.28/ 100

Ranked #1,200 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.8%)

Ranked #72 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 13.7%)

Ranked #68 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

220 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.4%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST44th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

25.8%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.73 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.3%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

11.9%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.4%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Watertown Town, Massachusetts (ZIP 02472), by its composite score, sits in the top 3.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,200th) and the top 13.7% of Massachusetts (72nd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: walkability is in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled obesity lands in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the top 1.8% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Childcare settles in the top 4.7% nationally, modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lies in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the bottom 6.8% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 02138, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 32.5; chronic-disease standing 93.2 (top 10%) — 61 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,485 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.2%20.4–24.1
High blood pressure among adults25.8%23.7–28.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.0
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Depression among adults24.7%22.3–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.6%31.1–36.1
Obesity among adults23.4%20.3–26.8
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%6.0–8.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.6%3.0–4.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.9%69.3–74.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%77.2–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.1%90.0–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%70.2–75.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.2%71.9–76.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.5%79.7–87.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.8–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.2%7.1–9.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.3%14.3–18.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.8%27.6–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.9%10.6–13.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.3–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%10.4–12.7
Any disability among adults22.5%20.3–24.7
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Independent living disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Mobility disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Self-care disability among adults2.1%1.9–2.3
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.9–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.5–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Loneliness among adults33.4%30.4–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)66.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle8.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate47.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population25.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households49.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$126,336$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$784,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,498$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured