Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02176

in Melrose, MassachusettsPopulation 29,650

65.90/ 100

Ranked #1,659 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.2%)

Ranked #109 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #97 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

84.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST61st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.8%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$133,953

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

13.9%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

150 intersections/sq mi

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.7%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.8%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.2%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Melrose, Massachusetts (ZIP 02176) lands in the top 5.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,659th) and the top 21% of Massachusetts (109th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled mammography is in the top 1.1% nationally, and obesity stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Household income settles in the top 6.2% nationally, and walkability lies in the top 5.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Transit lands in the top 6.0% nationally, modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Against that, lead in tap water rests in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled transportation noise is in the top 5.0% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 01890, about 1.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 16.6; chronic-disease standing 88.7 — 72 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,579 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.2%22.2–26.3
High blood pressure among adults27.6%25.3–29.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.4–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.0
Depression among adults24.7%22.4–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.7–38.0
Obesity among adults23.8%20.7–27.2
Stroke among adults2.5%2.2–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.1–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.3%2.7–3.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.6%70.8–76.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%78.3–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.8%90.7–92.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.8%71.0–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.1%73.8–78.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.3%80.6–87.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%15.3–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.8%7.5–10.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.6%14.6–18.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%27.1–33.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.2%10.9–13.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%13.2–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%10.3–12.8
Any disability among adults23.0%20.8–25.4
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Mobility disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.0–2.5
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.7–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–8.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Loneliness among adults32.8%29.9–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle10.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate67.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population17.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households44.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+20.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$133,953$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$822,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,970$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured