Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02111

in Boston, MassachusettsPopulation 8,407

60.25/ 100

Ranked #4,671 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.6%)

Ranked #280 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #186 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

1200 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.01% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

61%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

9.8%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

19.4%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

2.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

22 ppb

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

56.3%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

4.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 02111, one of several in Boston, Massachusetts places in the top 14.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,671st) and the bottom 47% of Massachusetts (280th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: walkability is in the top 0.01% nationally, and modeled obesity lands in the bottom 0.8% nationally. Dental providers stands in the top 0.4% nationally, and civic registers in the top 0.9% nationally. Physicians settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 1.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled transportation noise lies in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 0.3% nationally, and lead in tap water resides in the top 0.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle is in the top 0.9% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 02108, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.0 ± 2.8 years. A median household income of $87,404 predicts 79.5 years — 5.5 years above.

    Ranked #30 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.0 ± 2.8 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.9 years — 4.1 years above them.

    Ranked #322 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 5.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 92.4 (top 10%) — 87 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,663 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.5%15.8–19.4
High blood pressure among adults26.8%24.5–29.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Depression among adults21.9%19.6–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.6–37.0
Obesity among adults19.4%16.6–22.7
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.8–21.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.7–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%70.9–75.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%75.5–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.0–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.5%57.8–65.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%59.4–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.7%78.3–86.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%15.5–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%9.9–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%23.7–30.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%29.5–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%16.0–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.4–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.2–17.4
Any disability among adults26.8%23.9–30.2
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.6
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.5–12.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.0%23.7–30.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.5%16.5–22.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.9%17.7–24.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.8–16.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.7–13.2
Loneliness among adults39.9%35.8–43.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)17.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle56.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription96.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate26.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population43.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households52.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age33.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$87,404$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$1,033,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,926$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.0 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 85.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured