Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01832

in Haverhill, MassachusettsPopulation 26,386

54.03/ 100

Ranked #10,654 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #424 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #251 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 10.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.6%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST30th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

11.1%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.9%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

289 units

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 34% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US66th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 01832, one of several in Haverhill, Massachusetts ranks in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,654th) and the bottom 20% of Massachusetts (424th).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: lead in tap water registers at the national minimum, and modeled mammography lies in the top 2.9% nationally. Transit is in the top 8.5% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 8.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled transportation noise registers in the top 7.2% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 7.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden is in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 11.7% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 01835, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.0 ± 2.4 years. A median household income of $83,041 predicts 79.3 years — 2.6 years above.

    Ranked #570 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%21.8–26.3
High blood pressure among adults31.0%28.2–33.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.8–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Depression among adults23.7%21.0–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.1–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.0%31.1–36.8
Obesity among adults32.3%28.1–36.7
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.8%11.4–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.6–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.7%70.7–76.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.8–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.2–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%63.5–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.7–69.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%77.7–86.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%14.1–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.8–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%23.5–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%34.0–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%17.0–21.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.6–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.6–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.4–18.0
Any disability among adults29.7%26.6–32.9
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.2–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%22.1–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.5–19.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.4%17.2–21.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Loneliness among adults33.5%30.0–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–645.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)10.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle8.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate61.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population14.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households46.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+14.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age39.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$83,041$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$429,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,648$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.0 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured