Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01826

in Dracut, MassachusettsPopulation 32,629

57.83/ 100

Ranked #6,552 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #346 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #220 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

34.3%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST29th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.3%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

64.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

90.9%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Dracut, Massachusetts (ZIP 01826) places in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,552nd) and the bottom 34% of Massachusetts (346th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled mammography sits in the top 3.1% nationally, and obesity lies in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Fatal road crashes rests in the bottom 12.2% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure resides in the bottom 11.1% nationally. Household income is in the top 11.7% nationally, and modeled diabetes lands in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled arsenic stands in the top 2.4% nationally, modeled pfas registers in the top 6.4% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water settles in the top 8.3% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 10.8% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 01810, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.0 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 77.6 — 69 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,273 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.0%23.9–28.2
High blood pressure among adults30.0%27.6–32.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%8.0–9.5
Current asthma among adults12.1%11.0–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Depression among adults25.8%23.3–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%33.7–39.0
Obesity among adults26.3%23.0–30.0
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.4–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.6%3.9–5.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%71.3–76.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.6–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.2–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.5%68.5–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.9%66.3–71.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.5%78.3–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.9–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.4–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%18.3–23.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%30.2–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.8%14.0–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%15.0–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.6–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.7–15.9
Any disability among adults27.5%24.8–30.3
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.3
Mobility disability among adults11.4%10.1–13.0
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%20.4–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.6–12.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.1–14.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.2–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Loneliness among adults35.3%32.2–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)8.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population11.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households48.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+18.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$114,196$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$473,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,839$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured