Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01566

in Sturbridge, MassachusettsPopulation 7,362

61.81/ 100

Ranked #3,630 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.4%)

Ranked #223 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #22 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

86.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$137,730

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.6%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

3.3%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST63rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Sturbridge, Massachusetts (ZIP 01566) places in the top 11.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,630th) and the top 42% of Massachusetts (223rd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled mammography registers in the top 0.2% nationally, and grocery settles in the top 3.7% nationally. Household income sits in the top 5.5% nationally, and dental providers lies in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 6.6% nationally, poverty resides in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and modeled uninsured is in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 06281, just across the boundary. Further still, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.4–31.5
High blood pressure among adults33.4%30.4–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.7–11.5
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.8–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Depression among adults25.2%22.5–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%33.8–39.9
Obesity among adults30.2%26.1–34.5
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.7%7.0–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.3%2.7–4.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.7–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.8–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults92.2%91.1–93.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.0%69.5–76.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.9%73.4–78.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years86.5%82.4–89.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.8–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.0%8.3–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.4%16.6–22.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%28.1–35.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.9%12.1–15.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.7–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Any disability among adults25.3%22.4–28.1
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.3–6.8
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.3–12.3
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.9–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.2–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Loneliness among adults31.8%28.7–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate92.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households57.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age49.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$137,730$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$415,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,914$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 1.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured