Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01540

in Oxford, MassachusettsPopulation 10,979

54.16/ 100

Ranked #10,487 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #420 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #69 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

84.4%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST63rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

392 units

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.9 pCi/L

in the top 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.5%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oxford, Massachusetts (ZIP 01540), by its overall standing, sits in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,487th) and the bottom 20% of Massachusetts (420th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled mammography rests in the top 1.0% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Lithium in drinking water settles in the bottom 13.4% nationally, and modeled uninsured registers in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Crowded housing stands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Lead in tap water lands in the bottom 14.4% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon is in the top 12.2% nationally, and binge drinking resides in the top 14.1% nationally. Modeled arsenic rests in the top 16% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 01501, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%26.5–31.5
High blood pressure among adults34.0%31.2–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.5–14.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.0–8.1
Depression among adults27.5%24.7–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%33.2–39.0
Obesity among adults33.5%29.3–37.9
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.8–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.7–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%72.9–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.8–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults89.7%88.2–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.2–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.4%69.8–74.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.4%79.8–88.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%16.3–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.6–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%20.4–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%29.7–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%15.1–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.3–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.6–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.2–16.9
Any disability among adults29.1%25.8–32.2
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.9
Mobility disability among adults12.7%10.9–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%21.1–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.0–14.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.0–17.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.5
Loneliness among adults34.3%30.9–37.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle7.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate83.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population6.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households43.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$110,579$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$376,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,173$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured