ZIP code
01375
in Sunderland, MassachusettsPopulation 3,641
60.32/ 100
Ranked #4,620 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.5%)
Ranked #277 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 47%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Obesity
23.6%
in the bottom 3.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST18thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
49.5%
in the top 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Mammography
82.7%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST32ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Elder-services access
0.27 per 1,000 residents
in the top 5.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS95thDefinition & source ›
The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
42%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST11thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
31.2%
in the bottom 4.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
7.9%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
27.6%
in the bottom 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Transit access
3.8 per 1,000 residents
in the top 7.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST89thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
9.5%
in the bottom 7.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST21stUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Sunderland, Massachusetts (ZIP 01375) lands in the top 14.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,620th) and the bottom 47% of Massachusetts (277th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled obesity sits in the bottom 3.7% nationally, modeled mammography lands in the top 2.8% nationally, and elder services lies in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 4.9% nationally, diabetes rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Transit resides in the top 7.7% nationally, and modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Set against that, housing-cost burden is in the top 3.3% nationally, and homeownership sits in the bottom 5.8% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. On the overall standing, ZIP 01035, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 91%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 71%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 84%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 74%
11%
Disability
healthier than 86%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 44%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 23%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 30%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 86%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 89%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 89%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 41%
11%
Disability
healthier than 55%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 23%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 13%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
01035
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 69.62
Closest healthier
01054
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 63.74
Similar health profile
15006
Pennsylvania97% similar profile
Score 63.33
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 22.6% | 20.0–25.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 27.6% | 24.3–31.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.3% | 6.6–8.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.6% | 10.3–13.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.8% | 4.2–5.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.4% | 4.3–6.5 |
| Depression among adults | 25.9% | 22.2–29.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 7.9% | 6.8–9.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 31.2% | 27.4–35.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 23.6% | 18.4–29.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–2.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.8% | 7.7–12.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.3% | 3.3–5.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 71.1% | 67.8–74.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.7% | 75.0–82.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.9% | 84.5–89.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.3% | 68.8–77.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 68.9% | 65.5–72.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 82.7% | 76.9–87.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.1% | 15.0–21.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 10.3% | 8.0–13.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.7% | 15.1–22.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.4% | 29.9–41.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 14.2% | 11.8–16.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.2% | 14.9–19.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 11.2% | 9.5–13.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.3% | 12.0–16.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 25.3% | 21.3–29.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.5–5.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.7–8.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 9.5% | 7.8–11.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.7% | 2.3–3.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.6% | 3.1–4.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.6% | 19.9–27.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 8.7–14.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.1% | 10.0–16.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 7.9–12.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.6% | 6.2–9.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.3% | 31.3–41.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.8% | 5.5–8.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 14.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 6.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 2.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 3.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 62.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 45.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 6.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522 |
| Broadband subscription | 95.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 94.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 49.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 30.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522 |
| Homeownership rate | 42.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.2% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522 |
| Foreign-born population | 14.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527 |
| Single-parent households | 57.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520 |
| Population 65+ | 16.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527 |
| Median age | 35.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524 |
| Median household income | $68,083 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505 |
| Median home value | $458,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508 |
| Median gross rent | $1,672 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.7 yr ± 1.97 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.97 years of 84.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured