Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01225

in Cheshire, MassachusettsPopulation 3,216

54.61/ 100

Ranked #9,940 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #415 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #27 of 33 Pittsfield, MA ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

73.6%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST68th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.1%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

17.9 days/year

in the bottom 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.4%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

85.5%

in the bottom 33% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US33rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Cheshire, Massachusetts (ZIP 01225) lands in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,940th) and the bottom 21% of Massachusetts (415th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled colon screening rests in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Park land stands in the top 10.3% nationally, modeled tree cover settles in the top 10.5% nationally, and modeled uninsured lies in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 14.5% nationally, and transit lands in the top 19% nationally. Against that, recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 18% nationally. Physicians rests at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 01224, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%28.8–35.5
High blood pressure among adults35.0%31.4–38.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.2
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.5–9.2
Depression among adults25.6%22.3–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.4–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.8–41.7
Obesity among adults31.4%26.1–37.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.4–15.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.1%3.1–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.1–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.7–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.9%89.4–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.6%69.2–77.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.3–73.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.9%69.6–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.5–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.2%10.8–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.5%17.7–25.7
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%31.6–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%14.6–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.3–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.1–16.2
Any disability among adults30.4%26.3–34.9
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.6–9.0
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.3–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.3–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.1–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.0–15.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.3–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.7
Loneliness among adults32.0%27.5–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.1–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription85.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate89.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households60.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+30.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age53.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$69,803$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$268,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.1 yr ± 2.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.08 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured