Rocky Mount, NC metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score
Every Rocky Mount, NC metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.
Data release 202615 ZIP codes in this ranking
- 12,40827807in Bailey · 5,958 residents52.77
- 14,30027856in Nashville · 17,081 residents51.39
- 15,92427804in Rocky Mount · 30,713 residents50.23
- 19,12627557in Middlesex · 8,657 residents47.84
- 19,28427878in Sharpsburg · 1,094 residents47.72
- 19,42527852in Macclesfield · 2,269 residents47.62
- 20,10127803in Rocky Mount · 20,055 residents47.05
- 23,55727882in Spring Hope · 8,358 residents43.86
- 24,07527886in Tarboro · 18,381 residents43.33
- 25,31027864in Pinetops · 4,446 residents41.89
- 25,80627809in Battleboro · 3,930 residents41.30
- 26,00127891in Whitakers · 4,865 residents41.04
- 27,81327801in Rocky Mount · 19,532 residents38.35
- 29,19227819in Conetoe · 561 residents35.49
- 30,26327843in Hobgood · 876 residents32.20
Don’t see a ZIP code you expected? Not every ZIP carries a Score — 1 of this metro's 16 don’t have enough measured data across the nine health domains, and PO-box-only ZIPs aren’t mapped areas. Any ZIP’s own page explains its standing. Look up any ZIP code →
How this ranking works
Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 15 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.
Cite this ranking
The permalink /metro/rocky-mount-nc/ranking/2026-28662750 resolves to this exact release and never changes; this page always shows the latest. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.
A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.