Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202627 of 27 ZIP codes scored · 0.63M residents represented

Score snapshot

54.63Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
54.48Median scoremiddle of 27 scored ZIPs
63.80Highest score32937 · Satellite Beach
45.36Lowest score32926 · Cocoa
18.44Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#115Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
49%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.31M of 0.63M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.63MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0.63MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Open the full Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL metro ranking →One page, all 27 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

6 of 27 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Chronic Disease Burden28%175,991 people

Standing highest: 32904 West Melbourne32925 Patrick Afb32937 Satellite Beach

Healthcare Access25%157,275 people

2 ZIP codes tie at this end: 32796 Titusville32901 Melbourne32935 Melbourne

Climate / Disaster Risk25%155,670 people

Standing highest: 32901 Melbourne32903 Indialantic32935 Melbourne

Social Need / SDOH24%152,713 people

Standing highest: 32931 Cocoa Beach32937 Satellite Beach32940 Melbourne

Disability23%146,071 people

Standing highest: 32903 Indialantic32937 Satellite Beach32940 Melbourne

Risk Behavior20%128,028 people

Standing highest: 32931 Cocoa Beach32940 Melbourne32951 Melbourne Beach

Preventive Care17%110,197 people

Standing highest: 32931 Cocoa Beach32951 Melbourne Beach32976 Sebastian

Mental Health17%110,197 people

Standing highest: 32931 Cocoa Beach32951 Melbourne Beach32976 Sebastian

Environmental Hazard16%102,541 people

Standing highest: 32920 Cape Canaveral32937 Satellite Beach32976 Sebastian

Each fifth is about 6 of this metro’s 27 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 633,450 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.