Ogden, UT metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score
Every Ogden, UT metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.
Data release 202622 ZIP codes in this ranking
- 1,82384018in Croydon · 182 residents65.46
- 2,33084310in Eden · 4,577 residents64.23
- 2,52984317in Huntsville · 2,962 residents63.86
- 2,62884050in Morgan · 12,620 residents63.67
- 3,09984014in Centerville · 16,679 residents62.76
- 3,17484025in Farmington · 25,389 residents62.61
- 3,34884040in Layton · 28,509 residents62.28
- 3,47584037in Kaysville · 39,415 residents62.09
- 5,18284010in Bountiful · 46,871 residents59.55
- 5,61284414in North Ogden · 34,334 residents58.97
- 5,70884054in North Salt Lake · 22,355 residents58.85
- 6,22984075in Syracuse · 35,545 residents58.20
- 7,43984041in Layton · 55,180 residents56.82
- 7,95084087in Woods Cross · 16,808 residents56.32
- 8,01384315in Hooper · 9,873 residents56.26
- 8,19284405in Riverdale · 34,818 residents56.07
- 8,36784403in Ogden · 37,721 residents55.92
- 9,51584056in Hill Afb · 3,803 residents54.94
- 9,79584067in Roy · 38,794 residents54.73
- 10,60484015in Clearfield · 71,812 residents54.07
- 13,39484404in Plain City · 66,587 residents52.05
- 13,52484401in West Haven · 48,303 residents51.95
How this ranking works
Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 22 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.
Cite this ranking
The permalink /metro/ogden-ut/ranking/2026-28662750 resolves to this exact release and never changes; this page always shows the latest. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.
A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.