Helena, MT metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score
Every Helena, MT metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.
Data release 202617 ZIP codes in this ranking
- 4,15659634in Clancy · 5,521 residents60.95
- 4,63759633in Canyon Creek · 272 residents60.30
- 5,79659640in Marysville · 160 residents58.75
- 7,07759601in Helena · 31,728 residents57.20
- 7,70859648in Wolf Creek · 486 residents56.55
- 10,51859602in Helena · 30,754 residents54.14
- 10,62859631in Basin · 375 residents54.05
- 11,42759638in Jefferson City · 769 residents53.46
- 11,48259647in Winston · 358 residents53.41
- 12,24159643in Toston · 867 residents52.89
- 12,37959632in Boulder · 2,557 residents52.79
- 15,15159721in Cardwell · 423 residents50.79
- 16,41259635in East Helena · 8,292 residents49.88
- 17,00959644in Townsend · 4,187 residents49.45
- 17,12659759in Whitehall · 3,631 residents49.37
- 17,18159639in Lincoln · 1,021 residents49.34
- 19,15259410in Augusta · 520 residents47.82
Don’t see a ZIP code you expected? Not every ZIP carries a Score — 1 of this metro's 18 don’t have enough measured data across the nine health domains, and PO-box-only ZIPs aren’t mapped areas. Any ZIP’s own page explains its standing. Look up any ZIP code →
How this ranking works
Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 17 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.
Cite this ranking
The permalink /metro/helena-mt/ranking/2026-28662750 resolves to this exact release and never changes; this page always shows the latest. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.
A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.