Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99836

in Port Alexander, AlaskaPopulation 50

39.41/ 100

Ranked #27,132 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #99 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

7.3%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

8.1 per million

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

45.5%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

61.9%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST53rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

79.2%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

33.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

59.5 mi

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

59.3 mi

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

56.9 mi

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST48th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Port Alexander, Alaska (ZIP 99836) places in the bottom 15% nationally (27,132nd) and the top 47% of Alaska (99th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled energy burden rests in the top 1.0% nationally, and unemployment resides in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled mammography is in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and households without a vehicle lands in the top 0.4% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 0.5% nationally, distance to a nursing home registers in the top 0.5% nationally, and distance to an emergency room settles in the top 0.6% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 0.3% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 0.7% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, unemployment runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 99835, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.00%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

9%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.01%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.4–35.2
High blood pressure among adults39.7%35.3–44.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.4–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.5–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.1–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.5–12.3
Depression among adults21.5%18.2–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%10.7–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.4–42.4
Obesity among adults38.0%30.4–46.4
Stroke among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.0–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%7.5–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%70.5–77.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.2%65.7–74.5
Cholesterol screening among adults80.9%78.1–83.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.1%51.2–62.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.3%47.3–55.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years61.9%52.3–70.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.0–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.4%17.4–25.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%20.8–31.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%27.7–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.9%19.9–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.2–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%14.7–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.3–18.3
Any disability among adults35.3%29.9–40.6
Hearing disability among adults11.2%9.7–12.7
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.3–11.6
Mobility disability among adults17.3%14.4–20.3
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.4–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%19.8–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%12.7–20.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%11.1–17.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%9.8–14.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.1
Loneliness among adults30.7%25.6–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6451.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)45.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle79.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription66.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate83.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)33.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households85.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$57,813$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$118,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured