Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99744

in Anderson, AlaskaPopulation 120

54.05/ 100

Ranked #10,636 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #37 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a nursing home

50.7 mi

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

50.9 mi

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

49.4 mi

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST44th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.6%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

29.9%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

Anderson, Alaska (ZIP 99744), by its composite score, sits in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,636th) and the top 18% of Alaska (37th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lies at the national minimum. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and diabetes lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a nursing home stands in the top 0.6% nationally, distance to an emergency room registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and modeled mammography settles in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Next to the surrounding area, distance to a nursing home runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 99743, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

22%

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.02%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

9%

Disability

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%21.6–28.5
High blood pressure among adults33.4%29.1–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%4.9–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.3–8.0
Depression among adults21.2%17.8–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.1–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%30.4–39.3
Obesity among adults32.2%25.0–40.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.5–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%5.9–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.0%64.4–73.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.8%63.9–73.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%81.0–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%58.8–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.9%58.0–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.9%57.8–75.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%15.5–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.1%13.3–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%16.5–25.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%26.4–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.8%13.6–20.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.0–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.4–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%10.9–15.5
Any disability among adults27.6%22.9–32.5
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.6
Independent living disability among adults7.1%5.9–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.6%9.4–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.7–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.3–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%18.6–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%8.5–14.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%5.7–10.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%7.8–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.1
Loneliness among adults29.9%24.8–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription95.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate90.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households64.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age38.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$101,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$192,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 3.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.20 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured