Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99702

in Eielson Afb, AlaskaPopulation 3,260

47.63/ 100

Ranked #19,410 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #65 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 31%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Fairbanks-College, AK metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

18.6%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

44.2%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

17%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.5%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

3.1%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.0%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

4.4%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

22.5%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Eielson Afb, Alaska (ZIP 99702) lands in the bottom 39% nationally (19,410th) and the top 31% of Alaska (65th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Plainly stated, a few measures mark out this area: modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds rests at the national maximum. Homeownership is at the national minimum, and modeled binge drinking stands in the top 1.5% nationally. Better still, modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 0.8% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, stroke registers in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the bottom 0.7% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 99705, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.9%

21%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental HazardPartial

healthier than 24%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
High blood pressure among adults17.0%14.9–19.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults1.7%1.5–1.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults1.5%1.3–1.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.6%2.1–3.1
Depression among adults23.5%20.5–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened18.6%16.4–21.1
Obesity among adults33.4%29.0–38.0
Stroke among adults1.0%0.8–1.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.4–16.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%10.3–16.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure33.7%30.4–37.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults56.2%52.0–60.5
Cholesterol screening among adults63.9%59.3–68.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years44.2%39.7–48.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.4%54.0–60.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.2%57.1–70.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.5%19.3–26.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%10.2–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.6%16.0–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%34.9–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%12.3–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults20.4%17.6–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults9.4%8.0–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%15.0–21.2
Any disability among adults27.5%23.4–32.0
Hearing disability among adults3.4%2.9–3.9
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.3–9.1
Mobility disability among adults4.4%3.7–5.3
Self-care disability among adults1.8%1.6–2.1
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.4%24.5–32.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%12.6–19.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.1%8.6–13.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%11.7–16.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.5
Loneliness among adults40.3%36.1–44.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.4–10.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)0.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)13.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription99.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)57.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate0.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+0.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age22.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$68,640$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$2,089$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured