Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99649

in Pilot Point, AlaskaPopulation 52

34.91/ 100

Ranked #29,431 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.3%)

Ranked #110 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

14.2%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

172.1 mi

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

359.6 mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST67th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

9 per million

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

171.9 mi

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

78.2 mi

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST53rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.18 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST28th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

39.1%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

64.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST72nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Pilot Point, Alaska (ZIP 99649), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally (29,431st) and the bottom 48% of Alaska (110th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

What the data shows most clearly about this place comes first: modeled energy burden is in the top 0.06% nationally, distance to a nursing home rests in the top 0.2% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 0.4% nationally. Walkability registers in the bottom 0.6% nationally, households without a vehicle lands in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally. More positively, distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 0.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden is at the national minimum.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 99549, about 48 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.00%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

9%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.6%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%22.9–29.6
High blood pressure among adults38.7%34.4–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.0–7.6
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.4–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.3–10.8
Depression among adults19.7%16.5–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%12.7–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%30.4–39.0
Obesity among adults40.8%32.3–50.0
Stroke among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.9%21.5–30.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%9.5–17.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.6%65.9–72.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.3%62.5–72.0
Cholesterol screening among adults76.8%73.2–80.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.1%50.6–61.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.7%43.8–51.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.9%55.8–73.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.0–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.4%21.2–31.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%22.9–34.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%33.1–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.3%22.7–32.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.0–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.1–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%14.8–21.0
Any disability among adults38.4%32.7–44.3
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.0–13.0
Independent living disability among adults10.7%8.8–12.6
Mobility disability among adults17.5%14.4–20.6
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.2–6.1
Vision disability among adults8.1%6.7–9.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.9%25.7–36.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.6%20.7–32.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.6%14.5–24.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%15.7–23.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.0–19.0
Loneliness among adults34.0%28.4–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.6%11.8–17.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6450.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)18.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle39.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription60.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate87.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)13.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households53.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+25.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age41.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$95,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$115,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured