Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99605

in Hope, AlaskaPopulation 23

58.92/ 100

Ranked #5,661 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #10 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 4.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

58.8%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST36th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.27 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST32nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

60.9%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.5%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

14.6 mi

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hope, Alaska (ZIP 99605), overall, ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,661st) and the top 4.8% of Alaska (10th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled transportation noise rests at the national minimum, poverty registers at the national minimum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 3.8% nationally, housing insecurity is in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 5.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled mammography lands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 0.6% nationally. Home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and distance to a nursing home rests in the top 5.7% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 99540, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

22%

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.3%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

9%

Disability

healthier than 81%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.0–32.6
High blood pressure among adults36.6%33.0–40.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.1–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%4.9–8.3
Depression among adults18.3%15.8–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.5–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%36.9–44.4
Obesity among adults29.2%24.8–33.9
Stroke among adults3.5%2.9–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%8.9–13.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%4.9–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.2%71.6–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.8%67.1–74.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%84.9–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.5%59.6–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%61.5–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years58.8%52.2–65.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.2–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.9%8.9–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.7%14.0–22.5
Short sleep duration among adults28.3%24.9–32.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%12.1–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults12.0%10.1–14.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%10.6–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.9%8.1–12.2
Any disability among adults26.6%22.3–31.7
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
Independent living disability among adults5.9%4.7–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.9%9.5–15.0
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.3–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.6%2.9–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.3%15.3–21.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%5.5–10.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.1%3.5–7.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.1–8.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.8–5.8
Loneliness among adults28.4%24.7–32.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.5–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)60.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription60.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate60.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+100.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 2.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.15 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured