Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99559

in Bethel, AlaskaPopulation 7,241

39.05/ 100

Ranked #27,360 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.7%)

Ranked #102 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to an emergency room

356.5 mi

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

399.2 mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

160.4 mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST68th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

9.3 per million

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51.4%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST40th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

23%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.9%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST65th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

33.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.3%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Bethel, Alaska (ZIP 99559) lands in the bottom 14.7% nationally (27,360th) and the top 48% of Alaska (102nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: distance to an emergency room is in the top 0.2% nationally, and modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Crowded housing resides in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled mammography registers in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled transportation stands in the top 3.9% nationally. More encouragingly, distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 0.3% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 3.5% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, crowded housing runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 99576, about 74 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

22%

Environmental HazardPartial

in the top 0.00%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

9%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

17%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 22%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.5%18.0–23.1
High blood pressure among adults32.9%29.3–36.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Depression among adults20.3%17.2–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.1%26.6–33.7
Obesity among adults35.1%29.2–41.2
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.0%17.6–24.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.1%10.9–15.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure61.5%58.0–64.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults63.1%58.7–67.4
Cholesterol screening among adults72.1%69.1–75.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.4%46.1–56.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.8%42.1–49.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.9%55.3–71.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.0–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.6%21.3–27.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.4–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%33.5–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.1%21.9–28.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.6–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.4–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.0–21.9
Any disability among adults35.8%31.5–40.4
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Independent living disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.8–16.6
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.7%30.4–39.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.9%24.1–32.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.2–23.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.2%18.2–24.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.3%15.1–19.6
Loneliness among adults36.8%32.0–41.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.6–16.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6418.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)13.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle33.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate49.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)23.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population4.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households32.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+7.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age31.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$113,333$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$342,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,662$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 2.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.76 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured