Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99180

in Usk, WashingtonPopulation 465

45.93/ 100

Ranked #21,426 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #503 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 13.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a nursing home

23.2 mi

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.3%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Park land

29.3%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.9%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.4%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

92.7%

in the top 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.8%

in the top 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.1%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Usk, Washington (ZIP 99180) ranks in the bottom 33% nationally (21,426th) and the bottom 13.5% of Washington (503rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: park land registers in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and tree cover lies in the top 10.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. By contrast, distance to a nursing home registers in the top 2.6% nationally, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 3.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled hearing disability registers in the top 10.1% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 83856, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.1%32.5–39.6
High blood pressure among adults40.2%36.3–44.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.4–12.8
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.6–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.5–11.3
Depression among adults25.3%21.9–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%12.7–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%35.9–44.2
Obesity among adults40.1%33.5–46.7
Stroke among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.3%12.6–18.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.6–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.5–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.6%70.0–77.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.5–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%67.4–75.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.0%56.5–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%65.6–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.3–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.3–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%20.6–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%27.0–37.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.2–26.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.6–20.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.4–18.4
Any disability among adults37.9%33.4–42.6
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Mobility disability among adults18.9%16.3–21.6
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–647.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate92.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households74.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+36.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age62.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$63,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$428,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 2.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.12 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured