Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99026

in Nine Mile Falls, WashingtonPopulation 9,320

55.02/ 100

Ranked #9,422 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #233 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #14 of 57 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

21.1%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

11.4 days/year

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.9%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Nine Mile Falls, Washington (ZIP 99026), by its overall standing, sits in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,422nd) and the top 40% of Washington (233rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 8.3% nationally, homeownership rests in the top 8.7% nationally, and modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden settles in the bottom 10.9% nationally, and park land registers in the top 16% nationally. Poverty stands in the bottom 19% nationally. By contrast, modeled fine-particle lands in the top 4.0% nationally, and arsenic is in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the bottom 14.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 99208, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%30.1–34.4
High blood pressure among adults35.0%32.6–37.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%10.0–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.8–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.6–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Depression among adults24.7%22.6–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%10.2–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%35.5–40.4
Obesity among adults33.5%30.3–37.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%8.1–10.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%5.1–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%71.7–76.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.3%72.0–76.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.3–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%66.3–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.5%67.3–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%65.6–74.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%14.3–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.3–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%16.2–20.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.1%27.4–32.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%15.4–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%14.2–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.9–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%12.1–14.6
Any disability among adults29.8%27.2–32.3
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Mobility disability among adults13.7%12.3–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate94.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households67.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+25.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age48.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$100,599$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$540,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,608$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured