Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99016

in Greenacres, WashingtonPopulation 21,615

55.03/ 100

Ranked #9,400 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #231 of 581 Washington ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #13 of 57 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.4 mi

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.8 ppb

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

US92nd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.6%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12.9 days/year

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

78.6%

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Greenacres, Washington (ZIP 99016) lands in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,400th) and the top 40% of Washington (231st).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 5.6% nationally, fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Lithium in drinking water rests in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled fine-particle resides in the top 4.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Lead in tap water is in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 10.0% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. On the overall standing, ZIP 99019, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.1 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $103,472 predicts 80.2 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,767 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 5.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 74.1 — 69 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,273 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%25.0–29.1
High blood pressure among adults31.2%28.9–33.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%8.0–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.5–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults26.5%24.1–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%32.7–37.6
Obesity among adults34.5%31.0–38.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.5–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.6–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.3%67.6–72.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.5%71.0–76.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.8–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%64.1–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.9%65.5–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%74.0–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%15.3–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.7%16.5–21.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%28.8–34.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%15.2–18.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.4–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.7–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.6–15.7
Any disability among adults28.0%25.5–30.6
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.5–13.1
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–648.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population7.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households49.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$103,472$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$477,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,931$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured