Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98593

in Vader, WashingtonPopulation 1,541

50.23/ 100

Ranked #15,930 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #398 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

64.7%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

14.8 mi

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

15.8 mi

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

17.7 mi

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.2%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

92.6%

in the top 12.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Vader, Washington (ZIP 98593) lands in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,930th) and the bottom 31% of Washington (398th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled pfas sits in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and humid heat is in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 10.9% nationally, and homeownership resides in the top 12.3% nationally. Set against that, modeled mammography registers in the bottom 2.6% nationally, distance to a nursing home rests in the top 5.5% nationally, and distance to an emergency room stands in the top 7.5% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 98538, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.8%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%29.0–35.1
High blood pressure among adults37.2%33.8–40.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
Depression among adults25.8%22.7–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%36.5–43.8
Obesity among adults37.8%32.7–43.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.8–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.3–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%72.5–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.0%66.4–73.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.7–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%63.7–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.7%57.3–64.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.7%57.3–71.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.1–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.2–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.8%17.4–24.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%31.5–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.5–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.1–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.7–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.0–16.9
Any disability among adults32.4%28.4–36.5
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.4
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.4–16.7
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–648.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate92.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households54.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age48.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$84,244$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$343,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,191$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 2.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.21 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured