Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

97503

in White City, OregonPopulation 13,938

40.16/ 100

Ranked #26,650 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #366 of 407 Oregon ZIPs (bottom 10.1%)

Ranked #15 of 15 Medford, OR ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

6.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.1%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.24 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.6 per million

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.3%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.9%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.5%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

70.3%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

20%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

White City, Oregon (ZIP 97503), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 17% nationally (26,650th) and the bottom 10.1% of Oregon (366th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: grocery sits in the top 5.2% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Transit resides in the top 12.0% nationally, and modeled radon is in the bottom 5.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled fine-particle lands in the top 0.5% nationally, colon screening stands in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 7.0% nationally. Crowded housing settles in the top 10.7% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 12.6% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 97410, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Medford, OR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 58%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.7%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.6 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.2 ± 1.8 years.

    Ranked #1,521 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.5%24.8–30.2
High blood pressure among adults34.3%30.9–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Depression among adults27.9%24.5–31.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.7–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.9%29.5–36.3
Obesity among adults36.5%31.2–41.8
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.0%16.9–23.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.5%13.3–17.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.8%64.3–70.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.3%67.4–74.8
Cholesterol screening among adults79.0%76.6–81.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.1%50.2–59.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.0%47.6–54.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%63.0–76.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.8–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%15.3–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%23.3–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%32.4–42.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.4%22.7–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%19.2–23.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.2–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.3–21.4
Any disability among adults35.2%31.4–39.0
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.7% (4.7–26.4%) n=411
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.9% (0.9–19.7%) n=411
No HS diploma (25+)19.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (1.2–16.6%) n=412
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.7% (11.1–49.6%) n=412
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–10.0%) n=409
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–10.0%) n=410
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (76.7–96.9%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (14.6–42.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate83.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.5% (52.8–90.2%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–6.7%) n=410
Foreign-born population9.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.0% (0.0–13.0%) n=412
Single-parent households55.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.5% (43.5–77.1%) n=407
Population 65+14.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.5% (12.7–42.1%) n=412
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.1 yr (36.3–62.2) n=410
Median household income$70,263$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,301 ($49,007–$109,558) n=378
Median home value$327,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$413,900 ($238,120–$653,360) n=374
Median gross rent$1,212$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,252 ($807–$1,772) n=327
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.1 yr (76.4–82.0) n=409

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured