Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

97401

in Eugene, OregonPopulation 49,437

49.92/ 100

Ranked #16,362 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #183 of 407 Oregon ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #15 of 34 Eugene-Springfield, OR ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

44.8 per million

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.96 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

50.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

29.1%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

12.1%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

569 units

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 97401, one of several in Eugene, Oregon, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 49% nationally (16,362nd) and the top 45% of Oregon (183rd).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the top 2.9% nationally. Homeownership lies in the bottom 3.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 3.2% nationally. On the encouraging side, dental providers stands in the top 1.7% nationally, and outpatient is in the top 2.1% nationally. Physicians rests in the top 3.1% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 3.8% nationally. Walkability registers in the top 4.8% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 97404, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Eugene-Springfield, OR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 4.3 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 80.2 — 76 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,913 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.8%21.6–25.9
High blood pressure among adults28.4%25.7–31.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.2–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Depression among adults29.3%26.1–32.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.3%28.4–34.0
Obesity among adults32.8%28.5–37.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%9.0–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%7.2–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.9%64.3–69.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.8%66.3–73.0
Cholesterol screening among adults75.5%73.1–77.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%59.9–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.1%57.8–64.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%68.6–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.9–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.6–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.4%15.7–21.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%26.5–34.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%16.4–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults21.1%19.0–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.5–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.0%16.1–20.0
Any disability among adults31.9%28.6–35.2
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.9–12.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.7% (4.7–26.4%) n=411
Uninsured 18–646.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.9% (0.9–19.7%) n=411
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (1.2–16.6%) n=412
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.7% (11.1–49.6%) n=412
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–10.0%) n=409
Households without a vehicle15.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–10.0%) n=410
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (76.7–96.9%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)50.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (14.6–42.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate29.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.5% (52.8–90.2%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–6.7%) n=410
Foreign-born population7.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.0% (0.0–13.0%) n=412
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.5% (43.5–77.1%) n=407
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.5% (12.7–42.1%) n=412
Median age29.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.1 yr (36.3–62.2) n=410
Median household income$52,022$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,301 ($49,007–$109,558) n=378
Median home value$494,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$413,900 ($238,120–$653,360) n=374
Median gross rent$1,366$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,252 ($807–$1,772) n=327
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured