Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

97392

in Turner, OregonPopulation 6,770

56.08/ 100

Ranked #8,190 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #61 of 407 Oregon ZIPs (top 15.0%)

Ranked #2 of 30 Salem, OR ZIPs (top 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

41 per million

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

11.5 days/year

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.6%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

8.0%

in the bottom 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

70.7%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.8%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

16.5%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Turner, Oregon (ZIP 97392) lands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,190th) and the top 15.0% of Oregon (61st).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled mammography lands in the top 5.8% nationally, and humid heat registers in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 7.1% nationally, and poverty rests in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Modeled tooth loss is in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the top 17% nationally. Against that, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 1.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk resides in the top 16% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the top 17% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 97304, about 6.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Salem, OR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.4 ± 3.4 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.4 years — 4.0 years above them.

    Ranked #356 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 41.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 83.4 ± 3.4 years.

    Ranked #389 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%27.3–33.2
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.3–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.4–11.4
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Depression among adults26.9%23.8–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.0–40.2
Obesity among adults40.1%35.4–45.5
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.0%6.5–9.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.3–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.4%70.2–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%72.5–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.4–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%66.7–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.5–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.3%75.9–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.7–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.6–11.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.1%14.5–20.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%27.5–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.4–18.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
Any disability among adults29.0%25.7–32.6
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.9
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.7% (4.7–26.4%) n=411
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.9% (0.9–19.7%) n=411
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (1.2–16.6%) n=412
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.7% (11.1–49.6%) n=412
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–10.0%) n=409
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–10.0%) n=410
Broadband subscription95.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (76.7–96.9%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (14.6–42.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate86.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.5% (52.8–90.2%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–6.7%) n=410
Foreign-born population4.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.0% (0.0–13.0%) n=412
Single-parent households62.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.5% (43.5–77.1%) n=407
Population 65+20.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.5% (12.7–42.1%) n=412
Median age45.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.1 yr (36.3–62.2) n=410
Median household income$109,237$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,301 ($49,007–$109,558) n=378
Median home value$576,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$413,900 ($238,120–$653,360) n=374
Median gross rent$1,268$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,252 ($807–$1,772) n=327
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.4 yr ± 1.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.1 yr (76.4–82.0) n=409

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.71 years of 83.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured