Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

97216

in Portland, OregonPopulation 16,638

48.62/ 100

Ranked #18,159 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #211 of 407 Oregon ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #102 of 120 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA ZIPs (bottom 15.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

50 per million

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

47.3%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

19%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

13.2%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

402 units

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 97216, one of several in Portland, Oregon, by its composite score, sits in the bottom 43% nationally (18,159th) and the bottom 48% of Oregon (211th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 0.9% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 1.1% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests at the national minimum. Households without a vehicle resides in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled transportation noise is in the top 5.4% nationally. More encouragingly, floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, walkability stands in the top 3.5% nationally, and physicians registers in the top 4.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

Next to the surrounding area, industrial-pollution burden runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 97206, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 2.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 70.9 — 68 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,248 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 50.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.8 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #122 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%22.0–26.2
High blood pressure among adults31.1%28.5–33.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.6–7.9
Current asthma among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Depression among adults30.4%27.5–33.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.8%31.1–36.7
Obesity among adults30.3%26.7–34.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.7–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%8.0–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.1%66.2–71.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.5%67.5–73.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.2%80.3–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%56.4–64.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%56.2–62.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%68.7–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.7–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%13.0–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%19.4–25.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%26.9–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%19.5–24.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.9–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.9–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.4–18.9
Any disability among adults33.3%30.2–36.2
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Mobility disability among adults13.6%12.1–15.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.7% (4.7–26.4%) n=411
Uninsured 18–6412.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.9% (0.9–19.7%) n=411
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (1.2–16.6%) n=412
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.7% (11.1–49.6%) n=412
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–10.0%) n=409
Households without a vehicle19.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–10.0%) n=410
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (76.7–96.9%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)47.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (14.6–42.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate50.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.5% (52.8–90.2%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–6.7%) n=410
Foreign-born population16.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.0% (0.0–13.0%) n=412
Single-parent households48.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.5% (43.5–77.1%) n=407
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.5% (12.7–42.1%) n=412
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.1 yr (36.3–62.2) n=410
Median household income$70,442$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,301 ($49,007–$109,558) n=378
Median home value$450,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$413,900 ($238,120–$653,360) n=374
Median gross rent$1,467$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,252 ($807–$1,772) n=327
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.1 yr (76.4–82.0) n=409

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured